On Sunday, 14 September 2014, Russian authorities held "regional elections" in the annexed Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Referring to the so called "Russian laws", the authorities said that there would be no international observers as they did not invite them for regional elections.
However, "international monitors" did "observe" regional elections in St. Petersburg on the same day, and it was not at all surprising to see familiar faces.
Table 1. Individuals who participated in the electoral observation mission.
Table 2. Individuals invited to monitor the elections; participation unconfirmed.
As seen from the lists, the overwhelming majority of the monitors are EU-based far right politicians. At the same time, it is no longer surprising that German, allegedly left-wing Die Linke continues to collaborate with the European far right.
With the exception of Matthew Crosston, Angel Djambazki, Ludovic de Danne and Marian Szołucha, all the monitors who either took part in the electoral observation mission in St. Petersburg or were at least invited to take part in it were "observers" at the illegal "referendum" in the Crimea in March 2014. Djambazki, however, was invited to participate in the international conference called "Russia, Ukraine, New Russia: global problems and challenges" on 29-31 August 2014 in Yalta (I cannot confirm his participation, however).
Hence, this is almost a regular pool of individuals who are invited to legitimise controversial or unfair elections. Their coordinator this time has been Mateusz Piskorski, former member of neo-Nazi Niklot movement and former member of the far right Samooborona party. Since 2007, he has been the head of the European Centre for Geopolitical Analysis that specialises in legitimising controversial elections in Eastern Europe and Asia.
The results of the observation mission controlled by the Putin-friendly far right werepredictable:
Frank Creyelman: "The elections were transparent and well-organised. The elections were conducted to the highest European level [...]. We could not, although we tried, find any violations of the European standards. I want to stress that Belgium has much to learn from Russia".
Ludovic de Danne: "In comparison to Paris, the elections in St. Petersburg are better organised. We would like to communicate to all the members of the European parliament about the high level of the organisation and conduct of the elections in your city".
Johan Gudenus (who probably did not even leave Russia after the World Congress of Families in Moscow): "Democracy is splendid. But it does not have standards; it should take into account local peculiarities. We are satisfied with how prudently and efficiently the standards of democracy are interpreted in your country".
And here is one example how "prudently and efficiently the standards of democracy are interpreted" in Russia:
Gudenus would say that these were simply "local peculiarities".
However, "international monitors" did "observe" regional elections in St. Petersburg on the same day, and it was not at all surprising to see familiar faces.
Table 1. Individuals who participated in the electoral observation mission.
NAME | COUNTRY OF ORIGIN | AFFILIATION |
Fabrizio Bertot | Italy | member of the right-wing Forza Italia |
Frank Creyelman | Belgium | member of the extreme right Vlaams Belang |
Ludovic de Danne | France | member of the radical right-wing populist National Front |
Johann Gudenus | Austria | member of the radical right-wing populist Freedom Party of Austria |
Márton Gyöngyösi | Hungary | member of right-wing extremist Jobbik |
Piotr Luczak | Germany | member of left-wing Die Linke |
Jan Penris | Belgium | member of the extreme right Vlaams Belang |
Mateusz Piskorski | Poland | president of the European Centre for Geopolitical Analysis |
Milan Šarapatka | Czech Republic | member of the right-wing populist Dawn of Direct Democracy |
Ewald Stadler | Austria | leader of the Reform Conservatives |
Robert Stelzl | Austria | member of the Reform Conservatives |
Adrienn Szaniszló | Hungary | member of right-wing extremist Jobbik |
Marian Szołucha | Poland | vice president of the European Centre for Geopolitical Analysis |
Table 2. Individuals invited to monitor the elections; participation unconfirmed.
NAME | COUNTRY OF ORIGIN | AFFILIATION |
Hikmat Al-Sabty | Germany | left-wing Die Linke |
Valerio Cignetti | Italy | Secretary General of the Alliance of European National Movements |
Matthew Crosston | USA | Bellevue University |
Angel Djambazki | Bulgaria | far right Bulgarian National Movement |
Johannes Hübner | Austria | member of the radical right-wing populist Freedom Party of Austria |
Adam Krzysztof Kępiński | Poland | member of the left-wing Democratic Left Alliance |
Béla Kovács | Hungary | extreme right Jobbik |
Mateusz Piskorski and Fabrizio Bertot as observers at the regional elections in St. Peterburg, 14 September 2014 |
With the exception of Matthew Crosston, Angel Djambazki, Ludovic de Danne and Marian Szołucha, all the monitors who either took part in the electoral observation mission in St. Petersburg or were at least invited to take part in it were "observers" at the illegal "referendum" in the Crimea in March 2014. Djambazki, however, was invited to participate in the international conference called "Russia, Ukraine, New Russia: global problems and challenges" on 29-31 August 2014 in Yalta (I cannot confirm his participation, however).
Hence, this is almost a regular pool of individuals who are invited to legitimise controversial or unfair elections. Their coordinator this time has been Mateusz Piskorski, former member of neo-Nazi Niklot movement and former member of the far right Samooborona party. Since 2007, he has been the head of the European Centre for Geopolitical Analysis that specialises in legitimising controversial elections in Eastern Europe and Asia.
Mateusz Piskorski, coordinator of the electoral observation mission, at the meeting with Georgiy Poltavchenko. St. Petersburg, 15 September 2014 |
Frank Creyelman: "The elections were transparent and well-organised. The elections were conducted to the highest European level [...]. We could not, although we tried, find any violations of the European standards. I want to stress that Belgium has much to learn from Russia".
Ludovic de Danne: "In comparison to Paris, the elections in St. Petersburg are better organised. We would like to communicate to all the members of the European parliament about the high level of the organisation and conduct of the elections in your city".
Johan Gudenus (who probably did not even leave Russia after the World Congress of Families in Moscow): "Democracy is splendid. But it does not have standards; it should take into account local peculiarities. We are satisfied with how prudently and efficiently the standards of democracy are interpreted in your country".
Johan Gudenus (left) shaking hands with Georgiy Poltavchenko. St. Petersburg, 15 September 2014 |
Gudenus would say that these were simply "local peculiarities".
If you liked this article, you may wish to consider donating to the development of this blog via PayPal.